after the end of the civil rights movement. so at precisely the moment that black people have their second shot at equality in america, legally, legislatively, right? i mean, we could -- you know as well as anyone that we didn't need the 1964 civil rights act and the '65 voting act if the 13th and 14th and 15th amendment had really been sufficiento creating equality. so right after that moment, even under lyndon baines johnson, there is an expansion of federal support for local law enforcement on the basis that black people's crime is a danger to civil society. and again, all of this may make sense to a viewer and to a listener, if they didn't know that those same threats to civil society, posed by european immigrants weren't treated in a fundamentally different way. that's the point. crime in and of itself was not sufficient to justify a punitive, law and order political response or a set of ideas that exist today as they did then that saw black people's crime as evidence of some moral inferiority, some natural propensity to w